Latest News

by TRIPADVISOR 2019, 2020 & 2021

+51 9841 86268
Contact Now with our expert

Contact US

How to Make a Co-Host on Zoom

Looking for:

Transferring Zoom Cloud Recordings to Google Drive – MacDigital – Prerequisites for accessing and downloading Zoom recordings

Click here to ENTER


Being able to record Zoom meetings is a useful trick that can be used many different ways. You can even download Zoom recordings, allowing you to review them anywhere, on any device, without needing to be logged into your Zoom account.

You can even swap recordings with your friends and colleagues. Talk about portability! The question is: how do you do that? A recording you made and saved locally will be on your computer already so no need to download it! You can also download a cloud recording by someone else, but you need to have a valid URL link to it, and the host has to have permitted viewers to download it. What you need to get your hands on a Zoom meeting recording download depends on who created it and where it was saved.

But you can do it from either a desktop computer or a mobile device. In order to download a Zoom meeting recording that someone else has created and saved to the cloud, a few different things need to happen:. You can also delete recordings one at a time, in selected groups, or all at once.

There are also options to search for a specific recording, export a spreadsheet of data about your recordings, or delete multiple recordings at once. However, you may need administrator powers to use some of these features. Image credit: YouTube — Zoom. Clicking Open will display the file folder containing the recording files, so you can open them manually.

If only the Open option is available, it means that recording has been saved in the cloud on your Zoom account. In this case, clicking Open will not bring up the folder on your computer containing the recording files. That covers how to download a Zoom recording that you were the host for or at least find it. However, whoever hosted the meeting has to do a bit of work first. Then they have to share the URL and other relevant information for the recording. Image credit: Zoom Help Center.

Below that are the sharing settings for the recording. You can also choose whether or not to set a date where the sharing link expires, if you only want to share the recording for a limited amount of time. But how do you download one yourself once it has been shared? Say that someone shares a link to a Zoom recording with you and has allowed viewers to download it.

Now, how do you go about making a copy for yourself? Being able to record and download copies of Zoom meetings are just two of the many great features Zoom has. Check them out! What is covered in this article Prerequisites for accessing and downloading Zoom recordings How to find and download your own Zoom recordings How to change cloud admin settings so others can access your Zoom recordings How to download a shared Zoom recording.


How to download zoom recording without permission 2021 – how to download zoom recording without perm –


If necessary, legal argument will be advanced in this regard. Firstly, Mr Zuma never expressed the wish to adduce oral evidence in either his notice of the special plea, nor the special plea itself, nor in his founding affidavit, it being raised for the first time in reply.

Thirdly, that the special plea was raised in the terms in which it was pleaded, namely with reference to the subsection under which it was raised and identifying the evidence in support thereof so that this court and the State would know on what grounds it was based. If, for example, the special plea has no merit and is without any factual basis, then there should be no reason why, after hearing argument and following such procedure as this court approves in regulating the proceedings before it, as it is entitled to do pursuant to the provisions of s of the Constitution, [10] the special plea should not be dismissed summarily on the contents of the special plea and founding affidavit alone.

The charges go back to events which occurred more than 15 years ago. All the parties are desirous of achieving finality. It made good sense that the special plea be tried by the exchange of, and in the light of the contents of the affidavits, agreed to be exchanged between Mr Zuma and the State. An oral hearing is not required, neither on the wording of s 1 h , s of the CPA, or the law generally. If any real disputes of fact on material issues in the special plea were to arise on the affidavits, then those disputed factual issues, if properly identified, could be dealt with, if needs be, by an appropriate reference of the disputed issues only to oral evidence, or alternatively to trial.

That was an appropriate direction, having regard to the factual issues in dispute in that case. The special plea in the trial before this court has to be tried according to the procedure determined and sanctioned by the order which I granted providing for the exchange of affidavits, that is on the affidavits. The State agreed to such procedure and the procedure was sanctioned by the order this court granted. But that the hearing of the special plea could and should be determined on the issues arising from the affidavits, was clearly competent and proper.

That could be done by the filing of a notice setting out the detailed grounds for raising such a plea. That is what Mr Zuma in fact did in the special plea. He furthermore chose to amplify the grounds for the special plea in his detailed founding affidavit.

Nothing would preclude the special plea being tried on his version, assuming the correctness of the grounds advanced in support of his plea for the purposes of argument, and a conclusion being reached, as a matter of law, as if on exception in a civil matter, that such grounds do not begin to make out a case that Mr Downer lacks the title to prosecute.

Mr Trengove SC for the State pointed out that there has not been any attempt to identity these issues, and that Mr Zuma was content to claim a general referral to trial.

In my respectful view that is not an answer to the problem. A referral to oral evidence does not refer to issues, but requires an identification of factual evidence that might underlie the material issues, which are disputed. No specific factual disputes were identified. That is undoubtedly a correct position in law having regard to the wide powers a court has in terms of s of the Constitution to protect and regulate its own process, and to develop the common law, taking into account the interests of justice.

Section 4 of the CPA and oral evidence. During his address in court Mr Mpofu stated that if the special plea was upheld, that Mr Zuma wanted to lead evidence to demonstrate the particular nature of the prosecutorial bias, to justify his demand for an acquittal pursuant to s 4 of the CPA. Mr Mpofu accordingly submitted that s 4 envisages a range, or continuum, of instances where a plea of a lack of title might succeed, and that whether an acquittal of the accused should indeed follow, will require that evidence be led to justify such an order.

It was submitted that Mr Zuma requires such an opportunity, as he believes that he should be entitled to an acquittal. The plain meaning of s 4 does not contemplate such a range of instances, or a court having a discretion, depending on the facts giving rise to the particular lack of title of a prosecutor, to either acquit an accused, or not. If the special plea fails, then there is no scope for the provisions of s 4 to apply. Oral evidence on real disputes of fact concerning material issues.

I have concluded that there is no need for oral evidence, for reasons which will be articulated. The legal effect, conclusions and inferences to be drawn from facts thus assumed to be correct for the purposes of argument, are obviously for this court to determine. The inferences and conclusions sought to be drawn by r Zuma from any facts, no matter how honestly held by him, are plainly not binding on this court.

The complaints raised by Mr Zuma in support of the special plea. I give notice of my intention to raise a further plea in terms of section 1 h of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of that, for reasons that are set out in the plea explanation, Mr Downer SC should be removed as the prosecutor in this case as he has no title to prosecute.

There are facts and circumstances involving the conduct of Mr Downer SC and the NPA generally relevant to the protection and interpretation of my rights under section 35 3 of the Constitution for which it is necessary that Mr Downer SC be removed as a prosecutor in the case.

Furthermore, there are facts and circumstances that give me a reasonable apprehension that Mr Downer SC has conducted himself in this case in a manner that lacks the independence and impartiality that is necessary for a lawful prosecution. Examining his role in the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, Mr Downer has failed to uphold the standards of prosecutorial independence and impartiality needed to ensure that my trial is fair and conducted in accordance with the Constitution and common law.

In any event, Mr Downer has played a role that makes him an essential witness on the issue of whether there was political interference, the nature of which violates my fair trial rights. The evidence of the NPA that my prosecution would not be fair as a consequence of criminal and unlawful political interference disqualifies Mr. Downer from conducting a fair prosecution. In any event, Mr. When I enquired from Mr Mpofu which specific grounds, or facts and circumstances, were relied upon, he confined them to the twelve instances that had been identified by the State in its heads of argument, to which, he said, should be added the further two grounds of complaint introduced in the supplementary evidence affidavit.

The twelve instances identified by the State in its heads are:. The further two grounds in the Supplementary evidence affidavit [13] are:. The issues for determination. That is the only relief claimed and in respect of which notice was given.

If that primary sub issue is answered in favour of the State, then it is the end of special plea and the present enquiry.

That is undoubtedly a correct concession of law. The conduct of possible rogue elements in the NPA, and the conduct of Mr Downer must however be kept separate.

The special plea has as its purpose the removal of Mr Downer from the prosecution because he lacks title to prosecute. To do so would be to violate the ratio decidendi reason for the decision in Ndluli. That is not an issue before this court. I am bound by the rationes decidendi reasons for the decisions in that judgment.

But that is something to consider during the trial only when the materiality of any such allegations in respect of issues and evidence revealed to be relevant, are established.

The possible infringement of fair trial rights does not arise for consideration under the special plea. Instances of material prosecutorial misconduct by officials representing the State or the NPA as an institution, if not due to unlawful conduct by functionaries which can legitimately be set aside on review, should be challenged by way of an application for a permanent stay of prosecution, but do not arise for determination under a special plea in terms of s 1 h of the CPA, which is a procedure peculiar to the prosecutor, as I shall endeavour to demonstrate.

Objecting to a particular prosecutor. This list is not exhaustive. Private prosecutors — s 7 of the CPA. Indeed, the private prosecutor may even be the complainant. That would be an absurd interpretation. Other statutory prosecutors — s 8 of the CPA. By the very nature of the appointment and function of these prosecutors however, they act on behalf of and are required to promote the best interests of their employer, for example, a municipality.

They pursue the prosecutions they are authorised to institute with the proceeds of fines recovered pursuant thereto, being for the benefit of their employer. This provides them with a financial interest in the outcome of the prosecution. They would thus also not be independent and objective.

Public prosecutors. Section 1 h draws no distinction between public and other prosecutors private and statutory. Hence, as a matter of consistent statutory interpretation, viz-a viz public prosecutors, a lack of independence and impartiality would also not amount to a lack of title. Section 1 , 2 and 4 of the Constitution provides:. Section 20 1 of the NPA Act provides:. Hence, an advocate acting on behalf of a Director of Public Prosecutions DPP can always be asked to present his or her delegation.

They represent the interest of the general populace in the prosecution of crime. Complete independence and objectivity, or a lack of bias, as with a presiding officer, is not what our law and courts require of prosecutors, as I shall endeavour to show when considering the case law on the interpretation of s 1 h below. Examples of the latter would include instances of entrapment where the entrapment had to be authorised in terms of s A 4 of the CPA, or prosecutions under the provisions of the POCA, where specific authority is required in terms of s 2 4 authorising the prosecutor to prosecute that charge.

An example is R v Giuseppe and Others TPD where prisoners of war were charged without the detaining power’s first giving notice to the representative of the protecting power, as required by the Geneva Convention. That alone militates against an interpretation that the absence of authorisation would result in a lack of title to prosecute. However, the aforesaid interpretation of a lack of title to include a lack of specific authorisation to prosecute appears to have been accepted in our law and is now a principle to which I am bound in accordance with our system of stare decisis.

Whether it might also be possible to pursue such a challenge in a separate substantive application for appropriate declaratory and consequential relief, prior to an accused being called upon to plead, is an issue which need not be decided in this judgment, although, in principle, there appears to be no reason why that would not be possible.

The present is however not an instance, as in Porritt v National Director of Public Prosecutions [37] where the appellants relied on s 1 h of the CPA, but it had also been agreed between counsel for the parties that a separate application for the removal of the prosecutor was also an issue before the court, and the SCA entertained such an application, as separate and distinct from the special plea.

Instances of prosecutorial misconduct or an abuse of process may to be pursued in a separate application for relief that might be appropriate, which relief might include the removal of the prosecutor. But it is a process distinct and separate from the adjudication of a special plea in terms of s 1 h of the CPA. It was also assumed that the appellants were entitled to invoke s 1 h , as it happened on the facts of that case, midway through the trial.

Assumptions had, for the purposes of the judgment, been made in favour of the appellants. At the commencement of the trial the accused tendered a plea in terms of s 1 h alleging that these prosecutors lacked title to prosecute.

Two grounds were advanced in support of that plea. The first ground was an alleged lack of authority to prosecute for want of compliance with s 38 of the NPA Act.

Although the trial court upheld the s 1 h plea on the second ground, for a breach of fair trial rights, it nonetheless rejected the contention by the accused that it followed that they were entitled to demand an acquittal in terms of s 4. Their appeal was rightly dismissed, for reasons irrelevant to this judgment.

Their role in criminal prosecutions makes it inevitable that they will be perceived to be biased. On the contrary, it is the obligation of a prosecutor firmly but fairly and dispassionately to construct and present a case from what appears to be credible evidence, and to challenge the evidence of the accused and other defence witnesses with a view to discrediting such evidence, for the very purpose of obtaining a conviction.

That is the essence of a prosecutor’s function in an adversarial system and it is not peculiar to South Africa. That right was described in S v Shaik in these terms:. It is clear also that fairness is not a one – way street conferring an unlimited right on an accused to demand the most favourable possible treatment. It has to instil confidence in the criminal justice system with the public, including those close to the accused, as well as those distressed by the audacity and horror of crime.

But the remedy does not lie in s 1 h. I do not believe that to be a valid point of distinction, for inter alia the following reasons:. On appeal, the SCA answered the question of law posed, by finding that these were not instances of a lack of title. There is no point of distinction between Porritt and the special plea before me.

Porritt had also relied on s 1 h. Mr Zuma relies exclusively on s 1 h. Porritt is directly in point on the issue of the application and interpretation of s 1 h. It is significant to note that the removal of the prosecutors in Bonugli had not been sought on the basis of them having no title to prosecute as contemplated in s 1 h. Their removal was sought on the basis that their appointment was in conflict with the provisions of s 35 3 of the Constitution, which would affect their fair trial rights, and would therefore be unlawful.

That is different to what is claimed in the special plea. In Moussa , [58] referring to the above principle in Porritt , the court held that whether a trial is fair usually falls to be determined on a case-by-case basis, and stressed that courts will be astute to ensure that the constitutional guarantees of prosecutions without fear, favour or prejudice, and fair-trial rights, are met.

Whether fulfilment of that. What the accused cannot achieve, however, is to seek such removal by the device of entering a special plea in terms of s 1 h of the CPA. I am bound by the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Porritt.

The principles established in Porritt are not distinguishable from what is before me. Lack of title to prosecute is confined to instances of a lack of standing in the sense of a legally recognised interest, or the required authority, which a particular prosecutor requires to entitle him or her to prosecute an accused.

The fact that he had not done so, is of his own making. If not, then it must acquit the accused. It is unhelpful to speculate at this stage theoretically on a possible infringement of trial rights, which might never arise within the evidential matrix of the trial.

As was remarked by Kentridge AJ, [68] albeit in a different context:. By way of example, there would be no need to investigate and rule on the inadmissibility of evidence obtained in a constitutionally unfair manner, if that evidence will never feature or be adduced by the State in support of the prosecution.

There is no need to interpret s 1 h more broadly than the SCA did in Porritt something which, in terms of the principle of stare decisis , is in any event not open to this court. There is no such application before this court.

The special plea in terms of s 1 h of the CPA is the only issue. It involves an application, a separate and distinct process to the special plea contemplated in s 1 h , as the separate agreement relied upon by the appellants in Porritt in the hearing before the SCA, illustrates. In the present matter there is no agreement that a separate issue as to whether Mr Zuma might suffer trial prejudice or might not receive a fair trial, will be adjudicated additional to the special plea, at the pleading stage.

Nor has this court directed that an enquiry into whether Mr Zuma might suffer trial prejudice or not receive a fair trial, be decided at this stage of the proceedings. Once the written notice of the special plea had been delivered, I similarly clarified with Mr Mpofu, who had come to lead the defence team of Mr Zuma, when the plea was entered on 26 May , that what was raised was the special plea, not an application for the recusal of Mr Downer.

He confirmed that it was the special plea. The matter is postponed in absentia in respect of Mr Zuma and the Thales representative , to 17 May until 20 June being the end of term date for trial and that the matter will again resume on the first day of the third term in KwaZulu—Natal, and any further dates that the Honourable Judge presiding at the trial and the Honourable Judge President may determine, subject to further clarity on the resumption of international travel under the COVID 19 restrictions, which may affect witnesses and the Thales representative, Mr Durand from abroad.

This is in terms of the draft order signed by Judge. Mr Downer has been the lead prosecutor in the trial since , if not before, a fact well known to all. You can start these short self-paced Studylink subjects anytime. Don’t let the cost of study hold you back. Contact us No results were found. Call us on Email us at info csu. Get the advantage!

Apply now for an early offer at Charles Sturt At Charles Sturt we want you to have the best possible start to your next chapter. Key dates Applications open 1 February Round 1. Apply by 31 March Receive an offer by Early May.

Round 2. Apply by 24 June Receive an offer by Late July. Round 3. Apply by 31 August Receive an offer by Late September. Apply now for your chance to score an early offer to study with us in Choose from our wide range of on-campus and online courses. Take the pressure off with a guaranteed study offer. Get exclusive support that will help you step into uni life full of confidence. Be considered for exclusive scholarships based on your soft skills.

How it works We’ll look at two things: your Year 11 results and your soft skills. He is a force of nature that simply cannot be stopped.

Starting September 30, , any Meeting or Webinar recordings saved to Zoom Cloud storage will be retained in the Zoom Cloud for days, after which the recordings will be deleted from the Zoom Cloud. Incoming Trilogy is the perfect snapshot of a mostly forgotten video game eraZOOM has re-created that era better than ever!

Load up, lock-on and enjoy a slice of nostalgia! Pick a game, add it to your account and play it. Click the Home tab. How to rotate your camera before a meeting. In the journey of helping customers find the promotions they need, the most recent Reddit Zoom Codes might be viewed as the best choicesage verification mandatory for tech giants, Reddit, Zoom, gaming platforms.

Hackers are seeing opportunities to attack as users dabble in the platform’s new interface and functions. Instead of zoom. The internet is now rife with places where you can organize Zoom-bombing raids. Here come our Zoom virtual background templates to the rescue! Host a call from outer space, from under the sea, or from an interior that looks straight out of Good Housekeeping magazine by using any of these free Zoom meeting background templates.

Click on Chat. The post was shared in popular Subreddit «Anti Work My office has been on Zoom Phone for a few months and from day 1, every single call using the desktop app or mobile app, on wifi, ethernet, or mobile data, has had a delay of 1 second or more. ZOOM UT Austin Zoom is a centrally supported video conferencing solution available to university faculty, staff and students that enables you to meet, teach, and learn from anywhere.

Zoom’s video platform is your ticket to hosting successful digital events. The official Reddit app has access to exclusive new features like Chat, Community Group Chat and more. Can add closed captions and subtitles to Zoom meetings, recordings, webinars. Enhance your experience.

Get the Zoom app. In fact, the application is available for multiple operating systems , which makes it easier to sync data across devices. In the pop-up, click the button that says Lock Meeting. Automate your routine work and save time and money. Funded by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, TechConnect provides digital solutions, training and support to all California Community Colleges, and is hosted at Palomar College West Mission Road, San Marcos, CA My office has been on Zoom Phone for a few months and from day 1, every single call using the desktop app or mobile app, on wifi, ethernet, or mobile data, has had a delay of 1 second or more.

First time users will be prompted to install the Zoom application. Note: For more general information on best Reddit Enhancement Suite RES is a community-driven unofficial browser extension for enhancing your reddit experience. This is the new COVID My office has been on Zoom Phone for a few months and from day 1, every single call using the desktop app or mobile app, on wifi, ethernet, or mobile data, has had a delay of 1 second or more.

Featured Image: YouTube My office has been on Zoom Phone for a few months and from day 1, every single call using the desktop app or mobile app, on wifi, ethernet, or mobile data, has had a delay of 1 second or more.

We also may allow third-party advertisers to show you advertising relevant to you on our website, using their cookies on our site. Stay connected wherever you go – start or join a secure meeting with flawless video and audio, instant screen sharing, and cross-platform instant messaging – for free!

Real-time problems and outages for Zoom. While in a Zoom meeting, tap More in the controls. Founded in , Zoom is headquartered in San Jose, California, with offices around the world.

If you wish, you can press the blue Export button to save this information to your device. Zoom Communications’ Q1 revenue surged To view this video download Flash Player. Zoom is integrated with the University of Iowa Learning Management.

In this video people join random online zoom Audio transcription automatically transcribes the audio of a meeting or webinar that you record to the cloud. The steps listed below assume you have already scheduled the Outlook meeting and are going back to add the Zoom info, but you can use the same procedures to add Zoom info as you create the Outlook meeting.

If a tie is worn, use a solid tie rather than one with a pattern. In fact, these two sites are closely associated as far as content is concerned. When it comes to images, Imgur is as robust as Reddit. You can change the zoom factor from 1 up to All participants and hosts are now required to sign into a Zoom account prior to joining meetings hosted by UC Berkeley.

Leverage your existing hardware investment while planning your Zoom Rooms migration. Search reddit using the pushshift. When prompted for a «Company Domain», enter in «utexas» and click «Continue». I have a problem with Zoom. Premium awards are only available to Reddit Premium members.

When speaking, remember to look directly at the webcam, not at the screen. Once you paste the Reddit post link into our site, redv. Keep your Zoom meetings and webinars private and safe from unwanted attendees and «zoombombing. People nowadays are already accustomed to using the internet on tablet to search for zoom background funny reddit information to be used as inspiration for one of them in category information, and according to the title of this post, we will Reddit is home to thousands of communities, endless conversation, and authentic human connection.

Reddit Enhancement Suite is a community-driven unofficial browser extension for Reddit. Zoom will automatically change LIVE that web page. Right-click or Control-click the file or folder to open the context menu, and select the Share option. This will be sent in an email. Getting Started. Luckily, now that you get to hold meetings via Zoom, you can have a co-host. From time to time, there will simply be too many participants for you to handle on your own.

Are you planning an online presentation or a speaking event? When you enable a co-host, you can invite a guest speaker to your show and make it even better.

Before sharing your hosting privileges with this person, you need to enable this feature in your Zoom account. Follow the instructions below to do so:.

If you change your mind about making a meeting participant a co-host, you can also remove their privileges again.


– Charles Sturt Advantage – Study

But these are simply ruminations without the benefit of having heard considered argument. Secondly, a formal application in terms of s 2 4 of POCA dated 30 November , which contained a careful weighing up of the pros and cons of including racketeering charges in terms of s 2 1 of POCA in the indictment. The pro forma minute alluded to includes the following:.


Bouncing Back (and Forth): Statewide Reopening and Mitigation Steps | Littler Mendelson P.C..

How to apply Submit your Year 11 results with your online application and tell us the following. Mr Xulu. The proceedings on 10 August will be held virtually, not in person, and in the absence of Mr Zuma, who, as informed by the Estcourt Correctional Centre, is currently an in-patient in hospital under the care of the Presidential Medical Unit of the South African National Defence Force. They have not given any assurance that they will succeed.



Full Day



Rainbow Mountain Tour

Full Day



Atv Huaypo Lagoon, Piuray

Full Day



Atv Maras, Moray

Full Day



Bungee Jumping + Slingshot

Full Day



Panoramic Bus Ride

Full Day



Contact US by email Now!